ENGINEERING

 FORESTRY/GROUNDS

 SOLID WASTE

 Streets

 Water

Final Traffic Study
 
Neighborhood Traffic Study
See Gwun Avenue Traffic Calming Project
Traffic Signals
Traffic Volume Map
Street Weight Limits
 

Summary

Per the direction of the Village Board of Trustees, seven speed humps were installed in May 2006 on See-Gwun Avenue between Golf Road and Lincoln Street. The Engineering Division performed an interim traffic study in September 2006 and a final traffic study in April 2007. Similar to the results from the interim traffic study, the final traffic study found both vehicular speed and volume to be lower on See-Gwun Avenue since installation of the speed humps one year ago. Average daily traffic continues to be higher on We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, parallel streets on either side of See-Gwun Avenue, but not equal to the difference in volume on See-Gwun Avenue. It is believed that other north-south streets in the neighborhood such as Lancaster Avenue and Can-Dota Avenue have also experienced an increase in traffic since installation of the speed humps. With respect to overall vehicular speed on adjacent streets, We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue continue to see no noticeable change.

Based on the response received from the most recent surveys, See-Gwun Avenue residents overall continue to perceive lower vehicular volume and speed. They also believe the street to be safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. 56% of the returned surveys indicated a preference to have the speed humps remain.

A majority of the completed surveys from residents on We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue continue to believe there to be an increase in vehicular speed and volume on their street since installation of the speed humps. Also, residents on these adjacent streets are evenly split when it comes to supporting the speed humps on See-Gwun Avenue but a majority still does not favor speed humps for their street or throughout the neighborhood.


Traffic Data Collection

Soon before the speed humps were installed in May 2006, the Engineering Division gathered speed and volume data on See-Gwun Avenue as well as two adjacent streets, We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue. During this five-day test period, school was in session and the golf course experienced activity. In September 2006 and April 2007 after the speed humps were installed, speed and volume data were again gathered at the same locations. Similar to the initial study, school was in session and the golf course was busy. Click on the map below to see the locations of the traffic counters during all three studies.

Traffic Counter Location Map

The final traffic study performed in April 2007 continues to show that since the speed humps have been installed both vehicular speed and volume are lower on See-Gwun Avenue. At the two locations where speed data was gathered between speed humps (south of Go-Wando Trail and south of Sunset Road), the average speed was down 3 and 8 mph, respectively, when comparing the April 2007 study to the April 2006 study. Between Lincoln Street and Go-Wando Trail, the traffic counter on See-Gwun Avenue was placed 50’ from the speed hump for the purpose of gauging speeds just before vehicles traverse the speed hump. The average recorded speed was 18 mph. And the fourth traffic counter was placed between the Stop sign at Council Trail and the speed hump at the top of the hill near Lonnquist Boulevard. While the spacing between the speed humps is typically 350’ to 450’, the distance between the Stop sign and speed hump on this block is 575’. The average recorded speed was down 1 mph. At three of the four traffic counter locations on See-Gwun Avenue, volume was down approximately 50% when comparing the April 2007 study to the April 2006 study. The fourth location was near the bridge where there are no other north-south alternatives to get across Weller Creek in the neighborhood. Still, volume was down nearly 20%. Overall, traffic volume on See-Gwun Avenue has further decreased when comparing the results from the final traffic study in April 2007 to the interim traffic study in September 2006.

On We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, the average recorded speeds at all four traffic counter locations continue to see no noticeable change. Daily traffic volume increased on We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue but not equal to the difference in volume on See-Gwun Avenue. Volume was up anywhere between 10% and 52% when comparing the April 2007 study to the April 2006 study. It is believed that other north-south streets in the neighborhood such as Lancaster Avenue and Can-Dota Avenue have also experienced an increase in traffic since installation of the speed humps. Overall, traffic volume on We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue has further increased when comparing the results from the final traffic study in April 2007 to the interim traffic study in September 2006.

Below is a table summarizing the data of the three traffic studies.


Summary Table

 

 

Traffic Volume & Speed Graphs

Below are links to graphs highlighting the traffic volume and speed data.

See-Gwun Avenue Before & After Volume Data

We-Go Trail Before & After Volume Data

Na-Wa-Ta Avenue Before & After Volume Data

See-Gwun Avenue Before & After Speed Data


 

Resident Survey

In April 2007, a third survey was sent to the 98 properties along See-Gwun Avenue to gauge the impact of the speed humps. 64% responded to the latest survey. Overall, residents continue to perceive lower vehicular volume and speed (Questions 1 & 2). They also believe the street to be safer for pedestrians and bicyclists (Questions 3 & 4). With respect to fulfilling expectations, it appears residents perceive the speed humps to have had less effect in reducing vehicular speeds yet have had more effect in reducing vehicular volume when comparing the April 2006 survey to the September 2006 and April 2007 surveys (Questions 5 & 6). With respect to other issues that can be associated with speed humps, residents continue to be somewhat concerned about emergency response time, noise pollution, aesthetics and loss of on-street parking (Questions 7 – 10).

A majority of residents on See-Gwun Avenue appear to still be satisfied with the speed humps but support has declined over time (Question 12). 56% of the returned surveys prefer that the speed humps remain. The table below shows the results of the surveys.

 

Resident Survey - See Gwun

 

In April 2007, a second survey was sent to the 157 properties along We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue in the project area.  46% responded to the latest survey.  Overall, residents on these streets continue to believe there to be an increase in vehicular volume and speed since installation of the speed humps (Questions 5 & 6).  Residents were evenly split on their support (or lack of) for the speed humps on See-Gwun Avenue but a majority still did not believe speed humps on their street or throughout the neighborhood would have a positive impact (Questions 7 – 9).  The table below shows the results of the surveys.

Resident Survey - We-Go, Na-Wa-Ta
 


 

Analysis

Positive Impact
The two issues raised by residents of See-Gwun Avenue have been excessive vehicular speed and volume along their street. While the primary purpose of speed humps is to slow down traffic, they also can lower vehicular volume as some motorists will choose alternative routes. And based on the results of the traffic data, the vehicular speed and volume are lower on See-Gwun Avenue.

The 500 and 900 blocks of See-Gwun Avenue had traffic counters placed midway between two speed humps. On the 500 block, the average speed decreased from 25 mph to 22 mph. And on the 900 block, the average speed decreased from 31 mph to 23 mph. In addition, excessive speeding decreased significantly along the 900 block. Before the speed humps, 43.9% of motorists were traveling 32 mph or greater. From the April 2007 study, only 3.7% of motorists were traveling 32 mph or greater. From the residents’ perspective, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1-very slow, 5-at speed limit, 10-extremely fast), when asked about the perceived vehicular speed the average score decreased by 1.7 when comparing the survey before the speed humps to the latest survey in April 2007.

At the four traffic counter locations along See-Gwun Avenue, volume decreased between 16% (700 block) and 49% (400 block). This equates to a decrease in approximately 350 – 550 vehicles per day depending on the section of See-Gwun Avenue. From the residents’ perspective, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1-very little, 5-reasonable amount, 10-way too much), when asked about the perceived vehicular volume the average score decreased by 1.2 when comparing the survey before the speed humps to the latest survey in April 2007.

Not only have the speed humps impacted the vehicular speed and volume along See-Gwun Avenue, residents have also perceived an increase in pedestrian and bicycle safety. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1-very unsafe, 5-somewhat safe, 10-very safe), when asked about the perceived pedestrian safety the average score increased by 0.7 when comparing the survey before the speed humps to the latest survey in April 2007. And on a scale of 1 to 10 (1-very unsafe, 5-somewhat safe, 10-very safe), when asked about the perceived bicycle safety the average score increased by 1.0 when comparing the survey before the speed humps to the latest survey in April 2007.

 

Negative Impact
According to the Village Code, See-Gwun Avenue is a collector street. It provides the only north-south connection between Lincoln Street and Golf Road within the neighborhood. It also provides direct access to the Mount Prospect Golf Course. And as a collector street, mobility should be encouraged to promote the hierarchy of street classifications within the neighborhood. In other words, collector streets are expected to experience a greater volume of traffic than other neighborhood streets because they are designed to serve as a main link for neighborhood traffic to get to the main roads and vice versa. While vehicular volume has decreased on See-Gwun Avenue to the support of residents along the street, this redistribution of traffic is not necessarily beneficial to the neighborhood. Comparing the traffic study before speed humps to the latest study in April 2007, vehicular volume on the two adjacent parallel streets have increased between 10% and 52%. This equates to an increase in approximately 30 – 200 vehicles per day depending on the street. The 400 block of We-Go Trail which is a narrower street than See-Gwun Avenue now experiences more daily traffic than all studied blocks on See-Gwun Avenue except at the bridge (700 block). Speed humps are known as a volume reducer because some motorists will choose alternate routes. When placed on a collector street, a larger number of vehicles will shift to other streets compared to when they are placed on a smaller local street simply because a collector street experiences more traffic to begin with. Even residents on We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue commented in the surveys a perceived increase in vehicular volume on their streets.

Another issue with speed humps is their affect on all motorists not just those speeding excessively. Often times, a small percentage of careless motorists will give the impression there is an overall speeding problem on a street. Case in point, the traffic counter on the 500 block of See-Gwun Avenue recorded only 6% of vehicles traveling 32 mph or greater before installation of the speed humps. While the solution should be to correct the behavior in this small percentage of motorists, speed humps cause all motorists, including those normally driving at a safe speed, to drive differently. They force the driver to traverse them at 15 mph, well below the posted speed limit of 25 mph. This rise and fall in speed every 350’ to 450’ can frustrate motorists and also increases noise pollution in the neighborhood caused by constant braking and accelerating of vehicles.

Delaying emergency vehicle response also continues to be a concern for the both the Fire Department and Police Department, especially with speed humps on a collector street. Use of collector streets to get to an emergency in a neighborhood is essential and speed humps increase their response time. Through tests performed by the Fire Department, they have determined that the speed humps have added over one minute for an emergency vehicle to travel from Golf Road to Lincoln Street along See-Gwun Avenue. While one minute may not seem like a long time, this delay could be an important factor in the outcome of an emergency. Also, the jarring going over the speed humps can affect the passengers and wears the emergency vehicles causing an increase in maintenance costs. For all of these reasons, the Fire and Police Departments are not advocates of speed humps. Even residents expressed in the surveys some concern with potential delays with emergency vehicles caused by the speed humps.

The Public Works Department did not express significant concern with the speed humps from an operational standpoint. Street sweepers and snow plow trucks travel at a reduced speed and their drivers did not share any difficult experiences over the past year. However, larger snow falls and speed humps throughout the Village could pose concerns for their services. From a maintenance standpoint, annual repair to the asphalt and pavement markings would be necessary. This would be an added cost to the Village Budget.

A final issue that is worth mentioning is aesthetics. Some other traffic calming projects completed in the Village including curb extensions and median islands have had an element of landscaping incorporated into them. By adding features such as trees, bushes and grass, a project can enhance the attractiveness of a neighborhood. Speed humps, however, do not have an ornamental feature. They are comprised of asphalt, pavement marking and signs. This “hard” look can detract from the look of a neighborhood. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1-not, 5-somewhat, 10-extremely), when asked how displeased residents are with the aesthetics of the speed humps the average score increased from 4.5 from the September 2006 survey to 5.0 from the latest survey in April 2007.


 

Conclusion

As directed by the Village Board of Trustees, the Engineering Division has studied the impact of speed humps along See-Gwun Avenue over a one-year period. Vehicular speed and volume data was gathered on See-Gwun Avenue as well as two adjacent streets, We-Go Trail and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue. Also, multiple surveys were mailed in order to get resident feedback and various Village departments including the Fire Department, Police Department and Public Works Department provided input on this important project. As evident from the traffic studies, vehicular speed and volume have decreased on See-Gwun Avenue since installation of the speed humps while vehicular volume has increased on adjacent streets. The data and feedback from various interest groups have shown both positive and negative results along See-Gwun Avenue and in the neighborhood.

The next step in the process will be for the Village to host a Neighborhood Meeting. At this meeting, residents will have the opportunity to provide their thoughts directly to the Village Board of Trustees. Your input will assist the Village Board of Trustees in making a decision regarding the status of the speed humps on See-Gwun Avenue as well as future consideration on other streets in the Village. Such a meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 30th. The Neighborhood Meeting will be held in the Learning Resource Center at Lincoln Junior High School, 700 W. Lincoln Street, and begin at 7:00 p.m. The public is invited to attend and participate in the meeting.

Return to Top